 |
 |
 |
 |
#161409 - 12/07/05 03:26 AM
Re: Sitchin Related Archeology/News
|
-----
Member
Registered: 04/01/04
Posts: 1059
Loc: Dubai, UAE
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4505516.stm
Well another pieces falls into place for rise of man - how strange that it has nothing to do with the Annunanki...LOL
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
#161410 - 12/07/05 04:56 AM
Re: Sitchin Related Archeology/News
|
Mr.P.
Member
Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 2886
Loc: Atlanta
|
Ah, but interesting evidence pointing to a possible change in Earth's orbit, or a possible change in the tilt of Earth's rotational axis, or a possible change in the location of the spin axis - a la Velikovsky's theories re LATER times. Whichever change(s) of Earth, the ROOT cause may have been a "crossing" of Niburu - a la Sitchin???
The Anunnaki were mining gold in Africa 450,000 years ago and replaced themselves with Man some 300,000 years ago. The major gold veins were likely worked out long before 70,000 years ago and the sites (and humans?) abandoned when they began gold mining operations in the Americas.
There were 10,000 "Eves"??? Sounds like someone was running a cloning operation or some other kind of genetic factory to produce humans???
Rather than interpret the sentimental sediments in support with the Establishment's "Out of Africa Migration Theory", might those "seas" have been - instead of drought-produced - suddenly "boiled dry" by the hydrocarbon-fueled tail of a passing comet???
The article did NOT mention any scientific wild-a**ed guess as to the CAUSE of the theoretical LONG-term drought, nor mention any CONCURRENT evidence from any other part of the planet. "Hey, it sorta fits OOA - let's run with it!"
My favorite Out-of-Africa is Charlize Theron. 
_________________________
Before morning constitutional, "Dear goD, for the shit yoU are about to receive, yoU are welcome."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#161412 - 12/08/05 08:11 PM
Re: Sitchin Related Archeology/News
|
Wallis
Member
Registered: 03/05/02
Posts: 1754
Loc: Philippines
|
I am now talking into a tin can, for all the good it will do.
Historians cannot agree to any degree of accuracy as to what particular events occurred this year. Yet, we are to accept unequivocably the word of scientists that the orbit of Earth has been stable for the past few hundred million years. Let's see: there must be some kind of codex around. Pictures, maybe? A secret library in the Himalayas that has recorded such a calm, relatively quiet period (or is that epoch) in Earth's past?
"Move aside, folks! Lord Knozitall has spoken. Catastropheism is all in the mind. Never happened. Never will. Destroy any reference to the 2004 tsunami: it might someday be used against the religion of 'nothing changes.' Earthquakes don't happen either. The notion that the earth can swallow up whole tracts of land is--well--something out of the fertile but insane mind of Frank L. Baum!"
Yeah, yeah. And the Sahara Desert is a "new" desert, its birth around 6,000 B.C. Palestine was always a desert, despite the fact that Caesar conducted a scorched-earth policy in the first century A.D. and created desert-like conditions. And tells are just garbage heaps and not remains of some pretty sophisticated military outposts or cities and what have you. Oceans haven't drowned continents, and glaciers have been over-exaggerated.
The orbit has been pretty stable, so Lord Knozitall has just called all those scientists who have written papers on the Earth's pole reversal liars. Oh, yes. And since the Earth's axis tilted just a few thousand years ago--well, at least less than a hundred thousand years ago--so they are all liars. Lessee, magnetic north has been changing in relative postion to the stars. Either the massive iron deposit is moving or the Earth is tilting. But then our infallible expert and mouthpiece for all the New Mythmakers has just stated gospel: the orbit of the Earth has not changed for millions of years! So, the iron deposit is moving!
Thus, too, all of the records of the ancients are a deep plot--or that of a really, really long joke, where the punch line just gets funnier and funnier all the time--against future generations. Stars don't change! They just made things up so they could--what?
But then these were ancients. Translation: really, really dumb people! Not a decent scientist in the midst of them. Not even a decent clockmaker either. I mean, who really needs to build a clock that is acres in size. Kind of hard to carry that thing around.
The bottom line appears to be to believe the pearls of wisdom by our expert par excellance who needs not back up any of this statements--no matter how outrageous--with gospel. No, no. No need for chapter and verse, for the scripture is still formulating in his own mind.
_________________________
"Do not seek for truth,
Merely cease to cherish your own ideas and opinions."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Lazarus Starr, Ace1
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered
and 5 anonymous users online.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
