 |
 |
 |
 |
#241259 - 10/12/06 01:30 AM
Does anyone ask: What is the goal?
|
enkidu
Member
Registered: 04/20/04
Posts: 65
Loc: new jersey
|
What do they stand to gain when they have everything already? I mean, if they already control every government, and to a reasonable extent all of us, why do they need to make a single world-wide government when that's essentially what they already have?
Either there is no ultimate goal and it's all nonsense, or there is some ultimate goal which the single world-wide government will help them achieve.
What could that possibly be?
Is it something as absurd as calling ancient gods back down to earth in a "Look what I did! Aren't you impressed? Wanna make me your sidekick?" kind of way?
Or is it really as mundane as simply living at the top?
Is that all there is to it? That they're the ultimate edge of the humanist greed-driven survival-engine?
I mean, what really is the thing that drives these people? It can't possibly be that they just want easy lifestyles provided by the hard work of the herd. I have a very difficult time accepting that something so completely mundane would be enough to drive people into such complicated and aggressive lives.
Clearly there's something missing from this picture. Everything seems to fit neatly together, except: why do they do it?
Please, don't say "because they're crazy." Even if they are crazy, people have desires too. So what are they? What are they all working so hard for and why? What's the payoff?
And maybe they just use their own goofy inside psuedo religion as what they all say it is: a childish mockery of truly religious attitudes.
Cynical mockery of sincerity is the height of adolescent wit, and they're all such boys' clubs it seems like the most plausible.
They create, splinter, manipulate and defecate on religions while they pat themselves on the back for a job well-done exploiting the planet and its people?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
#241573 - 10/26/06 03:23 PM
Re: Does anyone ask: What is the goal?
[Re: -----]
|
Phil Fiord
Administrator
Member
Registered: 06/11/01
Posts: 3772
Loc: Washington DC, but don't let i...
|
JW,
It is odd to think the Soviet Union would be allowed to collapse if world domination is the goal, but think of that time when the US and CCCP were at direct odds. A stalemate.
I know this seems to support the conspiracy theory, but the only way to have lulled the US to weaken defenses was to topple the old Kremlin, at least in appearance if not in fact.
Indeed, the US defenses are not quite as expansive as they had been and we are overall in a sense of Russia is our friend. Yes, I believe there are good and kind people everywhere, but politically, Russia would seem to be at odds with the US, however discreetly. Beijing is a tad more overt.
Back in Summer 2000, I think it was, Moscow and Beijing had a summit in which the were quoted as saying they were joining in an effort to counter what they see as an expansionist United States. I have posted about that summit before, even back on Art Bells P2P, back in the day.
So, my point is, a goal of world domination could be fed by toppling the complete and open at odds between the west and the east.
I tend to think its not a world domination syndicate but socialist ideology that wishes to dispatch the US and her allies.
_________________________
"Perception is the art of defining reality. Be careful who you allow to define it."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Backstop
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered
and 6 anonymous users online.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe my name was just plucked from "Who's Who" like the rest of them?
