 |
 |
 |
 |
#243293 - 02/13/07 09:03 PM
Are the Anunnaki Reptilian?
|
Blahface
Newbie
Registered: 02/13/07
Posts: 1
|
Hello, I am new to posting on this forum but have been reading it for a few months now. I am also an avid listener of Coast To Coast AM as well as a viewer of history channel/independent documentaries, David Icke, and so on. But there is one thing I am very confused about, and this whether or not the Anunnaki are considered to be reptilian or not. Different people seem to have different views and its seems as thought its getting all jumbled up. For instance, in this wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anunnaki it doesn't say anything about them being reptilian, however this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reptoid does.
On C2C (as well as in books and lectures) David Icke has stated multiple times that they are reptilian and that a race of white Martians were around at the same time and even sites Zacharia Sitchin as his source, but on another episode of C2C back in December 06 2 other people researching the Sumerian tablets (I forget their names, but one of them was from xfacts.com and the other works with Sitchin) said nothing of the reptile race and in fact stated that they were thought to be white skinned with golden hair and blue eyes. As you can imagine I can go on all day citing one source that says they are reptilian and then another source saying nothing of the reptile race. So I was wondering if anyone here can shed some light on this  Sorry if this topic was brought up before, I used the forum search function and came up with nothing
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
#243296 - 02/14/07 05:29 AM
Re: Are the Anunnaki Reptilian?
[Re: Blahface]
|
Mr.P.
Member
Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 2886
Loc: Atlanta
|
BF: WELCOME! Oh, boy, are you starting something with this thread!
I've read all of Sitchin's books and have been intermittently restudying and researching them for 14 or so years. I don't recall his ever mentioning any reptilian characteristics of the 'Nakis.
NOT speaking for Sitchin, here is my OPINION: The original Naki colonists splashed down on Earth and went from sea to land. This BEHAVIOR/ACT has been reflected in the oldest human legends as nicknames and/or titles that relate to the sea (especially for Enki). From a human/Genesis mindset, the sea was the "Garden of Eden" for the Nakis on Earth. They never lived in or under the sea. They merely splashed down and came ashore, much like our Apollo astronauts. Then, as we have, they built launch and return facilities on land.
Some of the oldest stories and artwork picture a "god" wearing a headdress of reptilian nature (crocodile, etc.), but that may have just been an insignia or uniform to identify those few who were first arrivers, as opposed to the many (600 total) of the Johnny-come-laters. Personally, I think that this "reptilian" stuff is a thinly disguised ripoff of Sitchin, designed to sell the books by others. Just my opinion, mind you.
I think most assume the Nakis to have been "humanoid", what ever that means. If you want your own image, try this:
Stand butt naked in front of a mirrored wall.
On your left, have a cardboard cutout of a gorilla.
As you are half-Naki, look in the mirror and imagine the full-Naki standing on your right which would have the genes to mix 50/50 with the gorilla's genes to produce you, "the average" human.
I don't know what you'll come up with, but it certainly won't be a bipedal alligator or any other kind of reptile!
Some image-manipulating computer geek on this BBS could probably do this for us and post it. But please don't use Anna Nicole Smith as the human in the middle! If you can find a nude image of him on the net, Al Gore would be a good "average human".
_________________________
Before morning constitutional, "Dear goD, for the shit yoU are about to receive, yoU are welcome."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#243314 - 02/16/07 10:09 AM
Re: Are the Anunnaki Reptilian?
[Re: Mr.P.]
|
StarLord
Interested Investigator
Registered: 01/20/07
Posts: 37
Loc: USA
|
Mr. P,
Well, lets see your post:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
""I think most assume the Nakis to have been "humanoid", what ever that means. If you want your own image, try this:
Stand butt naked in front of a mirrored wall.
On your left, have a cardboard cutout of a gorilla.
As you are half-Naki, look in the mirror and imagine the full-Naki standing on your right which would have the genes to mix 50/50 with the gorilla's genes to produce you, "the average" human.""
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
There you have a "cut out" of the "Gorilla"
Thus my question, if Humans are closest to Chimpanzee DNA wise, why would you use the Gorilla cut out?
I don't need to obsfuscate. Just making sure of what you posted.
The other reason I asked is from most of my experiences with medical research readings, I seemed to have remembered somewhere sources indicating that when it came to experiments the Chimpanzee was the most similar to Humans (besides Pigs for some strange reason)
On the other hand, I for one happen to readily accept and have no problem with the idea that the Earth was seeded long ago by ET.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#243328 - 02/20/07 11:04 AM
Re: Are the Anunnaki Reptilian?
[Re: Mr.P.]
|
StarLord
Interested Investigator
Registered: 01/20/07
Posts: 37
Loc: USA
|
Mr. P
With all due respect to your learned position, what physical EVIDENCE do you have that supports your theory?
Are you aware of the nice gentleman that traveled all over the world, and I do mean ALL over the world testing the world's population of DNA. From Africa, to Siberia, to England, Asia, Canada, Russia, Australia, every major continent. Just for shits & giggles, he made sure he tested a full blood Hopi Indian.
Test results shows that every single person on this planet regardless of race or color is related. We are all cousins.
If I recall correctly it's something like 10 or 12 distinct famillies.
My simplistic research showed to me that each time there was a major shift in "evolution" the cranial capacity grew. My simplistic speculation led me to believe that the presence of increased brain mass may be a positive vehicle for higher consciousness. Higher consciousness may be the vehicle for self awareness which leads to the awareness of Spirit.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Lazarus Starr, Ace1
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered
and 5 anonymous users online.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
