 |
 |
 |
 |
#247761 - 09/24/09 02:00 AM
Re: Can I ask an expert, a question, Darby ??
[Re: Mr.P.]
|
TITOR RIGHT
Member
Registered: 09/16/06
Posts: 119
Loc: between rock and hard place
|
TR: Yesterday you said that you were going to post detailed proof that Darby is a liar, by sometime today? Where is it? Get your small mind in gear!
“ Clairvoyants meeting canceled due to unforeseen events. “
Bombs don't kill people, explosions kill people.
Mr. P, you seem to be able to regurgitate quite profusely, thinking not so much. You make many assumptions or extrapolation, which simply are not true. I said I would be back with a more detailed post ( as delivered). I did not say what the post would contain. Although, you could have assumed it would be in the scope of the thread, nothing more or less.
I also said I could “PROOF” Darby to be a fibber ( prevaricator), as in not “under informed” or “mistaken” nor “ignorant”, but “WILLFUL”. I did not give you a schedule or a time when this proof would be apparent ......
An unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys.
Tell me does your tiny mind get lost in your big head often .... Or, is this just a special occasion. Otherwise, do you have a special time you set aside, to humiliate yourself in public ??
I like kids, but I don't think I could eat a whole one.
I'd like to leave this world like I came into it; screaming, naked and covered in someone else's blood.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
#247778 - 09/25/09 11:27 AM
Re: Can I ask an expert, a question, Darby ??
[Re: Mr.P.]
|
TITOR RIGHT
Member
Registered: 09/16/06
Posts: 119
Loc: between rock and hard place
|
TR: Your small mind is still insulting people, I'm just returning the insults. By exposing your several areas of ignorance and your crude behaviors, you are the one making a public fool of himself. And your tangential quotes immediately above do nothing to avoid the issue that you haven't posted any of promised information re Darby or Thermodynamics. But due to severe ego needs - likely from lack of accomplishments as an adult - you have to continue to post insults and ignorant pseudo-science. You couldn't analyze your way out of a wet paper bag, let alone a complex, first-time event like a jetliner being flown into a skyscraper.
You know, you are right here Mr. P . I'm so far out of my depth here, and you're so good at your talents, excessive woebegone insight and verbiage, with scant observation , sniped inserts , of little actual value.... I thought I'd like to encourage you and help you develop those fine attributes. With that very impressive list of accreditations and hours being indoctrinated and absorbed by illusion. You can at least, help others to understand the real observation, contain in those cerebral synaptic maps of approved gray matter electro chemistry.
I just really am, troubled by the lack of educmacations, in the direct scientifically observed characteristics of “STEEL”....
Like before, you mentioned there where a number of “Bolts”, the only experience I have with bolts are those sticking out of my neck, ( My father installed them, to help place initial charge to “spark life” ). How do bolts work? When they fail, do they stretch or do they break or “shear” like a “tear”. Do they deform, and how does that work? I mean is not the bolt harder then the surrounding steel? Would not the steel deform before the bolt? Do they ever do experiments anywhere, with other great thinkers such as you and DARPA, I'm mean Darby... (Darn did it again, I'll figure out how to separate them some day) Anyway, do people really understand some where some how, how steel actually reacts under “stress” and force. You would think, some body would be doing that kind of thing, cause I can not understand How they could ever come up with a “Unified Building Code”, (world wide by the way) with out such a place of observation... HHHHUUUUUUUMMMMMMM …. ( Oh, humming “sweet mysteries of life resound and surround me”)
I, mean would these people be able to describe the failure of a system, I once heard a fairy tale of something called a forensic Architect, I'm sure it's just a myth like big foot. However, Mr P, having discovered your talent for regurgitation and inane observation. I thought you could try to edumacate me, on the finer observations . Like, does steel deform or does it "beak" oops- Break or does it some how work as a "BRAKE". If it breaks or shears, what is the corresponding force required, a rough constant of “rated steel” at specified grade will do. Why is steel a good conductor of electricity and how does that relate to the transfer of heat. I've always been confused on this point, ever since I failed at building my little home radio, self assembly required from radio shack. I think they ripped me off , never could get the thing to work, but I did short my self , ( straight to the neck bolts you know). I could hear voices in my teeth but not quite in my head or gray matter, plus all I could get at the time was “Glen Beck” and it made me throw up in my mouth a little bit....
Edited by TITOR RIGHT (09/25/09 11:37 AM)
Edit Reason: missed a letter, added a "dig"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#247779 - 09/25/09 11:51 AM
Re: Can I ask an expert, a question, Darby ??
[Re: TITOR RIGHT]
|
TITOR RIGHT
Member
Registered: 09/16/06
Posts: 119
Loc: between rock and hard place
|
Damn still a typo "WHERE" to "were a number of “Bolts”
I admit it I'm a nail bender not an editor .. I shall try to improve...
Edited by TITOR RIGHT (09/25/09 11:52 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#247783 - 09/25/09 02:21 PM
Re: Can I ask an expert, a question, Darby ??
[Re: TITOR RIGHT]
|
Mr.P.
Member
Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 2886
Loc: Atlanta
|
So, you're a bolt dolt, too!!! Dolt, it is impossible for a properly installed bolt&nut to fail under pure compressive force, as the force is transferred 100% to the two or more steel beams through which the bolt is installed. ["Pure"= in direction of bolt.] Tensile/pulling force can "stretch" the same installed bolt to a failure point. Said failure loads are standardized for every bolt and samples tested by standardized tests. I'm normally a very civil person [except when dealing with a dolt like you] but I'm not a Civil Engineer. Those guys add "fudge" or safety factors re the load bearing capabilities of bolts, nuts, and steel beams. Given the situation, the architect may insist upon even larger safety factors in the design of a specific structure. If you wish, you can look up the standards and the architect's specifications for every bolt and beam used in the World Market Towers. I can almost guarantee that the specs of those buildings were not designed to withstand the side impact of an airliner nor the explosion and down-flowing fires of the jet fuel. Dolt, you're the one trying to prove or disprove something in your ignorance, so you look up the inapplicable, under these first-ever conditions, standards yourself. And, Dolt, there is no correlation between the electrical conductivity and the heat conductivity for any solid material, so whatever your ignorant mind was going make of that is stupid. Either your father over-applied the electric shock treatment or you fried your brain with that 110 volt crystal radio kit.
So, you couldn't get or maintain a career in Geology, so you're now a jack leg carpenter who can't apply direct compressive force to head of a metal nail so as not to bend it? That experience alone should have told you that you are too ignorant of physics and the properties of metals to pretend to analyze the collapse of the twin towers. Have you EVER made a critical examination of your personal weaknesses or asked a friend or family member to do so? You need to do so, at least to the extent where you learn to keep your mouth and keyboard shut when the subject is one of the many of which you are ignorant. Just your B.S. [HOW appropriate!] degree has proven worthless does not mean that the educations and professions of all science and engineering graduates are so - but that is clearly your premise above. Your desperate ego is looking for something to hang it's hat on, but this ain't it.
_________________________
Before morning constitutional, "Dear goD, for the shit yoU are about to receive, yoU are welcome."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#247794 - 09/26/09 12:22 AM
Re: Can I ask an expert, a question, Darby ??
[Re: Mr.P.]
|
TITOR RIGHT
Member
Registered: 09/16/06
Posts: 119
Loc: between rock and hard place
|
Last thoughts here Mr. P. , It is holly untrue, that the buildings were not designed to withstand air strike, this is commonly known by anyone with any observations skills that has looked at the facts, which apparently are not in your scope of perception.
The trail is easy, we never started … Potential energy available, the mass of building.
Observation of excess kinetic energy, the heat signature visible from satellites for Weeks after event (melted pockets of metal found days and weeks after)... Lateral ejection of mass, some outside panels were ejected laterally over five hundred yards. The dust cloud created … all of this happening at the speed of shatter, which defies all known mechanical observation, this was not a mechanical collapse... and anyone can understand that... mechanical collapse regular stress, like deforming steel, this takes time, that is all the video said …. And somebody should correct P's physics there have been several major mistakes or observations ... If you have actually been to school you're probably laughing your ass off right now, like I am... This was all known 50 years ago Mr. P., it is not like the current science where you make it up as you go....
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Backstop, Rick Donaldson
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered
and 5 anonymous users online.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
